Trump loses bid to transfer New York hush money case to federal court

Trump’s conviction in the hush money case relates to conduct that preceded the 2016 presidential election, which led to his first term in the White House.

Skip NavigationJoin ICJoin ProLivestreamMenu

  • A federal judge rejected an effort by President Donald Trump to transfer to federal court the New York state criminal hush money case that ended with his conviction.
  • Judge Alvin Hellerstein’s ruling was the second time he had denied Trump’s request that his criminal case be handled in U.S. District Court in Manhattan.

US President Donald Trump speaks after signing an executive order that aims to rename Lake Ontario to Lake America in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on Aug. 27, 2026.Jim Watson | AFP | Getty Images

A federal judge on Friday rejected an effort by President Donald Trump to transfer to federal court the New York state criminal hush money case that ended with his conviction.

Judge Alvin Hellerstein’s ruling was the second time he had denied Trump’s request that his criminal case be handled in U.S. District Court in Manhattan.

Hellerstein said that Trump had waited too long after his May 2024 conviction to seek removal of the case to federal court.

Trump was convicted of crimes of falsifying business records in Manhattan state Supreme Court related to a hush money payment to keep porn star Stormy Daniels quiet before the 2016 election about her claims of having had sex with him.

“He cannot play one court against another; he cannot seek victory in one court, and then, when it becomes apparent that the court will rule against him, seek to remove his case to another court,” Hellerstein said in his ruling Friday.

The judge also said Trump had no legal grounds to remove the case from state court after he was convicted and sentenced.

Hellerstein also wrote that the evidence introduced at trial did not infringe on presidential immunity, and that Trump had not demonstrated that he was prosecuted by the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office for conduct related to his having been president.

“Paying hush money to an adult film star or engaging in a cover-up of
an embarrassment are not subsumed in presidential immunity,” Hellerstein said.

This is breaking news. Please refresh for updates.

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.

About The Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

About the Author

Easy WordPress Websites Builder: Versatile Demos for Blogs, News, eCommerce and More – One-Click Import, No Coding! 1000+ Ready-made Templates for Stunning Newspaper, Magazine, Blog, and Publishing Websites.

BlockSpare — News, Magazine and Blog Addons for (Gutenberg) Block Editor

Search the Archives

Access over the years of investigative journalism and breaking reports