Commentary: Why turning off screens is so hard for children

Digital content is designed to be engaging but this does not mean families should resign to a losing battle, says this academic.


Commentary

Commentary: Why turning off screens is so hard for children

Digital content is designed to be engaging but this does not mean families should resign to a losing battle, says this academic. 

Commentary: Why turning off screens is so hard for children

A child using a phone. (File photo: iStock/AzmanJaka)


Steven Howard

Read a summary of this article on FAST.

Get bite-sized news via a new
cards interface. Give it a try.

Click here to return to FAST
Tap here to return to FAST

FAST

OXFORD, England: The challenges and consequences surrounding children’s screen use are a leading concern for UK families.

One especially difficult challenge is the resistance, arguments and emotional battles – “techno-tantrums” – that can follow when parents ask children to end a screen-based activity or refuse children’s requests to start one. Most families with young children experience these at least occasionally and, for some, frequently.

It’s especially hard for children to move away from a screen because digital content is designed to be engaging. Content developers’ monetisation models usually require this to justify the expense to develop that content. At a minimum, this typically involves using bright colours and fast-paced content with quick and unpredictable transitions, as well as other cues to capture and hold attention. Algorithms ensure you mostly see what would be most interesting to you.

More contentiously, many examples of digital content for children include features that, in the most generous interpretation, persuade children to make choices they might not otherwise have made and may not be in their interests.

Guess Word

Guess Word
Crack the word, one row at a time


Buzzword

Buzzword
Create words using the given letters


Mini Sudoku

Mini Sudoku
Tiny puzzle, mighty brain teaser


Mini Crossword

Mini Crossword
Small grid, big challenge


Word Search

Word Search
Spot as many words as you can


Show More


Show Less

Examples include a beloved character encouraging the child to select a particular in-app option, exploiting the child’s emotional attachment with that character. Limited-time pay-to-play offers are presented to compel a quick decision, when slower deliberation may have led to a different choice.

A consequence is that children’s digital activity no longer unfolds solely based on their preferences and interests. Instead, digital design features aim to capture and hold children’s attention, motivate certain decisions over others, and, after digital activity has ended, hasten their return.

This battle between the gratification of continuing screen use or putting down the device when it is required or in one’s best interest is not unique to children. Parents report high rates of technoference – when their own digital activity impedes, interrupts or worsens interactions with their child. Children have even less ability to resist these lures and tactics to engage and sustain their attention.

This does not mean families should resign to a losing battle, or that all digital activity is inherently bad. There are things we can do to help, and at the same time establish foundations for children to better self-regulate their own digital activity and prepare for the digital demands in their future.



TIPS FOR PARENTS 

First, give slower-paced options. Provide children with digital options that have slower paced, educational content and more active engagement. Be wary of apps, platforms and programs high in persuasive design features. 

This will ensure children engage with digital content better aligned in content, pace and design to their developmental needs. Some reputable sources offer expert reviews and ratings of digital content for children.

Second, join in with children’s screen use. One of the largest reviews of research to date found a small association between children’s screen time and negative outcomes. Notably, though, some effects flipped positive when adults were engaged alongside children. Using a screen together helps families understand what their children are viewing and doing on digital devices. It also allows for shared interests, experiences and conversations during and after digital activity.

Third, be careful using screens as a distraction. Try to limit giving children digital devices to keep them occupied or calm them down. 

Children’s ability to deal with boredom, frustration, excitement or other emotions at times that might be especially undesirable to parents – in a doctor’s office, at a restaurant or on a long car ride – requires that they encounter and learn to manage these emotions. Children won’t learn to manage challenges they haven’t encountered.

GIVE CHILDREN SOME CONTROL

Last, establish a routine. Set clear and shared expectations of your child’s digital activity ahead of time and apply these consistently. This might be set periods in which digital activity is more commonly permissible (such as a family movie night), a restricted range of digital options from which they can choose, and a consistent location and duration of play.

Have a plan and let the child know what comes next. Having even a short yet fun transitional activity can help: an obstacle course, a game or asking your child questions about their interests related to the digital content.

Provide warnings in the lead-up to transition. Give them one or two warnings before the end of the digital play, reminding them what will follow next: “In five minutes we will turn this off and get ready for the park.”

Where possible, give children some control over the transition. No one likes having to stop before (what feels like) an activity’s natural completion. Children might be given some control over this by being given the responsibility to turn off the device when time is up or having a say in what follows next.

New routines are rarely immediately effective or without growing pains as families adjust. However, consistent use of approaches like these is reported to help children’s transitions away from digital devices, while also creating the conditions for beneficial digital engagement..

Steven Howard is a Senior Academic Research Leader in Child Development and Education at the University of Oxford. This article first appeared in The Conversation.

Source: Others/zw(sk)

Sign up for our newsletters

Get our pick of top stories and thought-provoking articles in your inbox

Inbox

Get the CNA app

Stay updated with notifications for breaking news and our best stories

Get WhatsApp alerts

Join our channel for the top reads for the day on your preferred chat app

Whatsapp

Get bite-sized news via a new
cards interface. Give it a try.

Click here to return to FAST
Tap here to return to FAST

FAST

About The Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

About the Author

Easy WordPress Websites Builder: Versatile Demos for Blogs, News, eCommerce and More – One-Click Import, No Coding! 1000+ Ready-made Templates for Stunning Newspaper, Magazine, Blog, and Publishing Websites.

BlockSpare — News, Magazine and Blog Addons for (Gutenberg) Block Editor

Search the Archives

Access over the years of investigative journalism and breaking reports