Australian judge floats giving court-appointed expert access to Tesla’s engineering systems
People work on the Tesla Model Y production line at the Tesla Gigafactory assembly plant during a media-organised tour, in Shanghai, on Apr 14, 2026. (File photo: AP/Andy Wong)
Read a summary of this article on FAST.
Get bite-sized news via a new
cards interface. Give it a try.
Click here to return to FAST
Tap here to return to FAST
FAST
SYDNEY: An Australian judge said he may order Tesla to give an independent expert access to its internal engineering platforms as part of a class action against the Elon Musk-led carmaker, a move designed to bypass a drawn-out discovery process that has dogged the case.
The lawsuit, filed in February 2025, alleges Tesla’s Model 3 and Model Y vehicles suffer from “phantom braking” and that the advertised self-driving capability and battery range were overstated.
Federal Court judge Tom Thawley suggested appointing an independent expert after lawyers for the applicants, representing some 10,000 Tesla owners, complained the documents Tesla had turned over failed to capture crucial technical information they needed to run the case.
Bringing in an independent expert who was endorsed by both sides “would eliminate the discovery issue because they would have, if they needed access to something, the power to get access”, Thawley told the court on Tuesday (Sep 1).
Guess Word
Crack the word, one row at a time
Buzzword
Create words using the given letters
Mini Sudoku
Tiny puzzle, mighty brain teaser
Mini Crossword
Small grid, big challenge
Word Search
Spot as many words as you can
He added that he would not necessarily keep the court-appointed expert away from certain material “just because one of the parties doesn’t like that idea”.
The matter is yet to go to trial as the parties clash over the discovery process.
Tesla says it has handed over thousands of documents in good faith but that its engineers use live, continuously edited software platforms that do not keep point-in-time records or simulate paper documents.
Thawley said a single court-appointed expert in each relevant field with access to the systems themselves would be cheaper and faster than fighting over documents, and told the parties he would consider ordering it over their objections.
Lawyers for both sides said they would seek instructions on the suggestion of an independent expert, but Fiona Roughley, representing the applicants, said the idea made sense.
Imtiaz Ahmed, who represents Tesla, said his side would think about the suggestion, noting its systems were highly confidential.
The matter returns to court on Nov 12.
Source: Reuters/rk
Sign up for our newsletters
Get the CNA app
Stay updated with notifications for breaking news and our best stories
Get WhatsApp alerts
Join our channel for the top reads for the day on your preferred chat app
Get bite-sized news via a new
cards interface. Give it a try.
Click here to return to FAST
Tap here to return to FAST
FAST
About The Author
