Naughty Flicks

Skip NavigationMarketsBusinessInvestingTechPolitics & PolicyVideoWatchlistInvesting ClubPROLivestreamMenu

• The Trump administration’s monthslong campaign to challenge how states conduct elections and pushback against those efforts come to a head on Election Day.
• Those efforts have included lawsuits, an attempt to implement a new U.S. Postal Service rule for mail-in ballots, threatening letters to state election officials and a plan to increase the number of poll monitors.
• California Attorney General Rob Bonta told CNBC that Democratic state attorneys general have “war-gamed” for “all the possibilities” for election interference.

watch nowVIDEO06:32The issues motivating voters ahead of the 2026 midtermsNews Videos

The Trump administration‘s monthslong campaign to challenge how states conduct elections and pushback against those efforts come to a head as Election Day arrives Tuesday.

Those efforts have included lawsuits, an attempt to implement a new U.S. Postal Service rule for mail-in ballots this year, threatening letters to state election officials and a plan to increase the number of poll monitors.

The administration could continue such efforts beyond Election Day.

Democratic lawmakers, attorneys general and advocacy groups are poised for battle if the administration tries to interfere with voting sites or challenge ballot counts, particularly in the states that could determine whether President Donald Trump‘s fellow Republicans lose their narrow Senate majority.

“Got to be prepared for anything, and we are,” California Attorney General Rob Bonta told CNBC on Monday evening.

“We’ve been, you know, blocking and tackling and protecting and defending our elections for months and through the last few weeks of the voting window, and it’ll all culminate tomorrow. And each of Trump’s attempts has failed,” Bonta said.

After a series of legal losses by Trump’s Department of Justice in election cases, “I’m not sure what he has up his sleeves,” the attorney general said.

But he also said that he and other California officials, along with the 23 other Democratic state attorneys general for months have been preparing for Election Day and potential actions by the Trump administration “to disenfranchise and suppress votes and voters.”

“We game-planned, and you know, war-gamed and tabletop- and scenario planned all the possibilities,” Bonta said.

“We’re ready for National Guard or ICE or Marines at polling stations near polling stations, armed people near polling stations,” he said. “We are ready for ballot seizures tomorrow, and I think we’re ready for the monitors that are coming.”

Bonta said that if those extreme events happened, California officials would quickly seek relief from the court system.

He noted, “We have laws in place right now where it is a criminal offense” to remove ballots from the custody and control of an election official.

An election worker opens voter ballots for the midterm elections at the King County Elections headquarters on Oct. 23, 2026 in Renton, Washington. David Ryder | Getty Images

On Monday, multiple federal courts were dealing with urgent motions in election-related lawsuits and appeals by and against the Trump administration.

The cases include an appeal by the DOJ of the dismissal Sunday of its lawsuit seeking a delay in the certification of Alaska’s Senate election if incumbent Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan loses by a margin that could be attributable to voter confusion from having a man with the same name on the ballot.

In another case, the DOJ on Monday asked the Supreme Court to block California from counting about 20,000 mail-in ballots from voters whom the DOJ suggests might not be U.S. citizens. Hours later, the Supreme Court rejected that request without any noted dissents.

In U.S. District Court in Washington, a DOJ lawyer told Judge Reggie Walton on Monday that the department expected to deploy 900 people to monitor polling places at sites in all 50 states.

“In 2024, there were about 100 monitors,” the lawyer, Kathryn Barragan, said.

The DOJ separately has said it will deploy approximately 1,000 election monitors and observers. 

Her statement came at a hearing where Walton was considering an emergency request by the NAACP to bar the DOJ from using election monitors who are law enforcement personnel from federal agencies, including the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, the Drug Enforcement Administration and the Bureau of Prisons.

John Cusick, assistant counsel at the Legal Defense Fund, a civil rights group, said the administration has used the DOJ, Department of Homeland Security and other federal agencies to target election procedures this election cycle for three main reasons.

“First and foremost, it’s an attempt to intimidate voters and election officials,” Cusick said in an interview.

“The second component is confusion” about election rules, he said. “And the third, the unfortunate part, is trying to lay the groundwork for challenging the post-election counting and certification of ballots.”

He said there has been a “constant barrage” by the administration to target election workers and election officials with unlawful actions.

That included, he said, the DOJ sending state election officials letters warning them of potential criminal prosecution if they fail to retain election records.

“That has created such a chilling effect,” Cusick said. “There’s no doubt that the threats are threats to our democracy.”

The DOJ, which did not respond to a request for comment by CNBC for this article, has previously defended its election-related efforts.

“Voting by noncitizens and other ineligible voters is a federal crime, and the department will enforce the law whether a case involves one illegal ballot or hundreds,” the DOJ’s rapid response account on X said on Oct. 12.

Attorney General Todd Blanche, when asked on Oct. 22 if there was any scenario in which the DOJ would try to block states from certifying their election results, conceded that was possible.

“I mean, is there any scenario?” Blanche told reporters in Virginia. “Yes, of course. There’s scenarios that we could all come up with, hypothetically, you know, some doomsday scenario, for example.”

“It is not DOJ’s intention to, and it’s never our intention to improperly interfere with elections and the state confirmation process or certification process,” the attorney general said.

“But, you know, to say that there’s no circumstances that we would ever do that? Of course I’m not going to say that.”

Cusick and other experts note the president and executive branch of the federal government have no official role in administering elections, which are handled by the states as designated under the Constitution.

In her ruling Sunday dismissing the DOJ’s Alaska Senate lawsuit, District Court Judge Sharon Gleason said the Trump administration was making requests that involve “the time, place, and manner of Alaska’s election, which are the responsibilities of the State, not the executive branch of the federal government.”

Voters fill out their ballots at a polling location inside Wayne County Community College – Northwest Campus on the final day of early voting for the midterm election in Detroit, Michigan, US, on Sunday, Nov. 1, 2026.Emily Elconin | Bloomberg | Getty Images

On Monday, a bipartisan group of former election officials in a filing told the 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals that “increased federal pressure and threats on election officials … are part of a pattern by the administration of attempting to assert authority over elections and questioning the integrity of state and local officials.”

The filing came in a case where the DOJ is appealing an order issued Friday by a federal judge in California barring the Trump administration “from carrying out a series of efforts to actually or attempting to intimidate, threaten, or coerce election workers who aid others in exercising their right to vote.”

The judge cited threats by the DOJ to prosecute state and local election officials if they process and count ballots using procedures that are legally required.

The ruling noted that on Oct. 26, the administration sent a letter to the state of Washington identifying potential noncitizens and “demanding that the Washington Secretary of State halt the processing of ballots.”

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., on Sunday night convened the entire Senate Democratic Caucus for a briefing by him and election attorney Marc Elias about what a Democratic aide said was the “current landscape of election threats from Trump and his allies.” The aide spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the private briefing.

“Senate Democrats are not waiting until Election Day to confront these threats,” the aide said. “If Trump and his allies attempt to interfere with the will of the voters, Senate Democrats are prepared to fight back immediately and aggressively, on Election Day and for as long as it takes to ensure the results are respected.”

Bonta, California’s attorney general, said he expected Trump and the DOJ To continue targeting states over their election procedures through the next cycle in 2028, when voters will choose a new president.

“We can’t be naive about it. We have to expect it to get worse, prepared for it to get worse. I don’t want to be alarmist,” Bonta said. “I am a realist though, and I see the way he thinks and acts and what he’s done, and maybe we’ll be prepared for the worst, and it’ll never happen.”

“But we can’t not be prepared for it. And I expect him to escalate as he gets more desperate.”

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.Read More