Chinese genetic firm Novogene sues US over military designation
FILE PHOTO: The Pentagon building, pictured from the Washington Monument in Washington, D.C., U.S., June 24, 2026. REUTERS/Tom Brenner/File photo
Read a summary of this article on FAST.
Get bite-sized news via a new
cards interface. Give it a try.
Click here to return to FAST
Tap here to return to FAST
FAST
WASHINGTON, Nov 4 : Chinese genetic sequencing firm Novogene sued the Pentagon late Tuesday in US District Court in Washington over its inclusion on a US list of companies allegedly aiding Beijing’s military.
In June, the Defense Department added Novogene, Chinese e-commerce giant Alibaba, internet search provider Baidu and automakers BYD and NIO and others to its list of “Chinese military companies” that prohibits the Defense Department from contracting directly with the firms.
Novogene noted its US unit employs about 180 people at its Sacramento office and at sequencing centers in Sacramento,
California, and Beaverton, Oregon. “Novogene does not design, develop, or market products for military use,” the company’s lawsuit said. The company called the designation unlawful and said it has resulted in “serious, irreparable, and unwarranted economic, reputational, and other harm.”
Guess Word
Crack the word, one row at a time
Buzzword
Create words using the given letters
Mini Sudoku
Tiny puzzle, mighty brain teaser
Mini Crossword
Small grid, big challenge
Word Search
Spot as many words as you can
The Pentagon did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The designation does not impose formal sanctions but starting in 2027 restricts purchases of their products or services by the Pentagon through third parties.
A number of Chinese firms have sued the Pentagon over the designations. Last week, a US judge granted Alibaba Group Holding’s request for a preliminary injunction, ordering the US government not to deny Pentagon contracts after the company sued over its designation.
Last month, two subsidiaries of BYD sued the Pentagon over a federal law banning any Pentagon contractors from hiring lobbyists that also work with blacklisted firms, arguing that it breached BYD’s First Amendment rights.
In August, DJI, the world’s largest drone maker, appealed its inclusion on the blacklist with the court finding merit in its argument that unclassified records did not support the conclusion that the company contributed to the Chinese defense industrial base.
The appeals court ordered the lower court to reconsider its decision to reject DJI’s bid to be removed from the Pentagon list and the case is ongoing. In August, biotech firm WuXi AppTec Co also won a preliminary injunction from a US federal court, which blocked its inclusion on the list. WuXi said the Pentagon designation was politically motivated.
Source: Reuters
Sign up for our newsletters
Get the CNA app
Stay updated with notifications for breaking news and our best stories
Get WhatsApp alerts
Join our channel for the top reads for the day on your preferred chat app
Get bite-sized news via a new
cards interface. Give it a try.
Click here to return to FAST
Tap here to return to FAST
FAST
