Judge orders Meta to pay US$25 billion to New Mexico in Cambridge Analytica case
The US$25 billion penalty comes as Meta faces a series of legal cases over its handling of users’ personal data.
Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg arrives outside court to take the stand at trial in Los Angeles, California on Feb 18, 2026. (Photo: Reuters/Mike Blake)
Read a summary of this article on FAST.
Get bite-sized news via a new
cards interface. Give it a try.
Click here to return to FAST
Tap here to return to FAST
FAST
SAN FRANCISCO: A New Mexico judge ruled on Wednesday (Oct 21) that Meta must pay US$25 billion to the state after a jury found last month that the social media giant had deceived users in a case related to the Cambridge Analytica scandal, according to media reports.
The penalty comes a couple of months after Meta agreed to pay US$18 billion to settle claims brought by 48 other states, including allegations tied to Cambridge Analytica.
Meta slammed the case as “a tax on speech”.
“This ruling … makes it all but impossible to do business in the state of New Mexico,” Meta said in a statement. “We are confident we will prevail on appeal.”
Guess Word
Crack the word, one row at a time
Buzzword
Create words using the given letters
Mini Sudoku
Tiny puzzle, mighty brain teaser
Mini Crossword
Small grid, big challenge
Word Search
Spot as many words as you can
Cambridge Analytica was a political consulting firm found to have improperly harvested personal data from millions of Facebook users for targeted political advertising, notably during the 2016 US presidential election.
Revelations at the time showed that the firm had obtained data gathered through a personality quiz app called “thisisyourdigitallife”, which was installed by about 270,000 users but also collected information on their friends.
In total, the app reached roughly 87 million Facebook users worldwide.
Facebook learned in December 2015 that Cambridge Analytica had acquired the data but did not disclose it publicly until 2018, after a whistleblower came forward, sparking a major political scandal.
Jurors in the New Mexico trial found that the misconduct affected all of the state’s more than 2.1 million residents.
“We disagree with the verdict and will continue to defend ourselves against efforts to distort our record,” a Meta spokesperson said in a statement in September.
New Mexico Attorney General Raul Torrez hailed the ruling as a “historic” win.
This case was “about whether corporations can mislead consumers about what happens to their personal information without facing meaningful consequences. New Mexico stood its ground”, Torrez said in a statement.
PENALTIES PILE UP
Meta has faced a slew of lawsuits in recent months.
Earlier this year, New Mexico won nearly US$1 billion in combined penalties against Meta in a separate case over harms to children.
In March, a jury in that case ordered Meta to pay US$375 million after finding the company liable for endangering children by making them vulnerable to predators on its platforms, among other harms.
In August, a judge ordered Meta to implement product changes and pay an additional $567 million to the state to fund the treatment and prevention of harms caused by Facebook and Instagram.
That same month, Meta agreed to pay up to US$17.7 billion to 52 US states, plus Washington, DC, to settle claims that it deliberately engineered its platforms to hook young users, misled the public about the risks and unlawfully collected data from children under 13.
As part of that settlement, Meta agreed to make significant changes to Facebook and Instagram accounts used by teenagers, and portions of the settlement hinge on other major social media companies agreeing to similar changes.
In September, TikTok agreed to pay Alabama at least US$100 million and enact limits for teen users, avoiding a trial over claims related to child safety on the platform.
TikTok previously settled other cases that were headed for trial, including a Los Angeles lawsuit brought by a young woman and a suit from a Kentucky school district.
In a landmark trial that concluded in March, Meta and YouTube were convicted by a Los Angeles jury, which found both companies were responsible for a teenager’s social media addiction.
That jury awarded the teenager US$6 million.
Source: AFP/fs/dc
Sign up for our newsletters
Get the CNA app
Stay updated with notifications for breaking news and our best stories
Get WhatsApp alerts
Join our channel for the top reads for the day on your preferred chat app
Get bite-sized news via a new
cards interface. Give it a try.
Click here to return to FAST
Tap here to return to FAST
FAST
