Tech bosses press G20 to build data centers, but split on risk
Nvidia chief executive Jensen Huang tells G20 ministers AI is essential infrastructure, even as US communities push back against new data centres.
Nvidia chief executive officer Jensen Huang speaks at the G20 Innovation Ministerial summit as US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick listens, in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, US, September 2, 2026 (Photo: REUTERS/Jonathan Drake)
Read a summary of this article on FAST.
Get bite-sized news via a new
cards interface. Give it a try.
Click here to return to FAST
Tap here to return to FAST
FAST
CHAPEL HILL: Top US tech bosses, including Nvidia chief Jensen Huang and OpenAI’s Sam Altman, urged G20 ministers Wednesday (Sep 2) to embrace artificial intelligence and build the data centres to run it.
The executives spoke on the second day of a G20 meeting in North Carolina, where the Trump administration corralled the AI industry’s top figures to pitch their vision to ministers from the world’s leading economies.
“In the end, what every single country will have to recognise is that (AI) is infrastructure, just as it’s water, roads, electricity, the internet,” Huang told the ministers.
“Every single country needs to build infrastructure so that you can support your own local economy,” he said.
![]()
Guess Word
Crack the word, one row at a time
![]()
Buzzword
Create words using the given letters
![]()
Mini Sudoku
Tiny puzzle, mighty brain teaser
![]()
Mini Crossword
Small grid, big challenge
![]()
Word Search
Spot as many words as you can
Nvidia is the key corporation behind the generative AI frenzy that has catapulted it to become the world’s most valuable publicly traded company.
Housed in data centres going up around the world, the company’s graphics processing units are key components for training AI models.
Such facilities provide “the digital intellectual capacity to support your researchers and students and society and industries and startups,” Huang said.
However, data centres have become a political hot potato in the United States, with many communities opposed to their construction and concerned about the impact they will have on electricity rates.
Huang also pushed back on notions that AI posed a threat to jobs.
“The idea that somehow all the jobs are going to be eliminated or removed – that’s just nonsense,” he said.
Work would be redefined rather than eliminated, he argued.
“The tasks are going to be automated, but our jobs’ purpose remains,” he said.
In a reflection of public concern, the meeting on the campus of the University of North Carolina was met with about 100 to 200 people protesting AI’s fast development.
Huang reserved his sharpest warning for governments that dwell on the technology’s risks.
“The worst outcome is that you don’t take advantage of it, that you are left behind,” he said, adding that countries would suffer if leaders “talk about the technology with fear, with uncertainty.”
His appearance was moderated by US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, who called Huang an “American treasure.”
“WORRY IS WARRANTED”
Altman, addressing another session, was less pushy about data centres.
“Some of you will choose to build data centres. Some of you will choose to rent data centres (from) other people because you don’t want them in your country,” he said. “I think all that’s fine.”
But adoption itself was not optional, the OpenAI chief argued, comparing a country refusing AI to one refusing electricity a century ago.
“It is non-negotiable. You have to use it,” Altman said. “The value to a country is too high to ignore.”
He struck a more alarmist tone than Huang on risk.
“Worry is warranted. Worry is how we anticipate problems,” Altman said, drawing a parallel with the development of fire safety after blazes destroyed cities.
He also cautioned against the technology concentrating wealth, saying OpenAI did not want to be the only company in the field or to “suck up all the value.”
GOLDILOCKS MOMENT
Ministers in the room were more circumspect.
Chris McDonald, the UK’s science and technology minister, told AFP nobody disputed the opportunity the executives were describing, but that “clearly the people leading businesses have a different set of responsibilities to people running countries.”
Britain was pursuing AI acceleration and public trust at once, he said, warning that neglecting either would be problematic.
“There’s no choice between things like IP protection and AI, or economic growth and growing AI. You’ve got to get the sweet spot where you get them both in the same place,” McDonald said.
“The porridge can’t be too hot or too cold. It’s got to be just right, and that’s a matter of judgment,” he added, calling it a Goldilocks moment.
Britain has not seen the level of opposition now facing US projects, McDonald said, but he cautioned against assuming it would stay that way, citing British resistance to hydrogen projects and fracking.
“We have to be really careful just to make sure we take communities with us,” he said. “It’s not about being an evangelist for the technology; it’s about being practical, pragmatic.”
Source: Agencies/fs
Sign up for our newsletters

Get the CNA app
Stay updated with notifications for breaking news and our best stories
Get WhatsApp alerts
Join our channel for the top reads for the day on your preferred chat app

Get bite-sized news via a new
cards interface. Give it a try.
Click here to return to FAST
Tap here to return to FAST
FAST















