UN says world must navigate ‘reality’ of 1.5°C overshoot
Policymakers need to recognise that “the rules of the game are now changing”, a co-author of the UN report says, warning that existing climate plans are not prepared for a world that temporarily warms beyond 1.5°C.
The United Nations logo adorns a window at UN headquarters in New York City, United States, on Sep 18, 2025. (File photo: Reuters/Jeenah Moon)
Read a summary of this article on FAST.
Get bite-sized news via a new
cards interface. Give it a try.
Click here to return to FAST
Tap here to return to FAST
FAST
PARIS: The United Nations outlined on Wednesday (Sep 2) how the world might bring global temperatures back to 1.5°C once the milestone target is breached in a first-of-its-kind assessment that drew criticism from climate activists.
UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres last year acknowledged the inevitability of overshooting 1.5°C, but this is the first time a UN agency has addressed this head-on in a dedicated report.
Scientists agree that warming above 1.5°C relative to pre-industrial times poses grave risks and nearly 200 nations committed in 2015 to try and keep global temperature rises to this safer threshold.
But the world is expected to blow past 1.5°C in a matter of years and attention has pivoted to making any “overshoot” as brief and contained as possible.
Guess Word
Crack the word, one row at a time
Buzzword
Create words using the given letters
Mini Sudoku
Tiny puzzle, mighty brain teaser
Mini Crossword
Small grid, big challenge
Word Search
Spot as many words as you can
In a much-anticipated report, the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) stated unequivocally that 1.5°C would be surpassed and “the challenge has shifted from avoiding overshoot to navigating it”.
Report co-author Richard Betts from the University of Exeter said: “It’s a reality check. We have to live with this warmer world … but there’s still a lot we can do to limit warming.”
The report “was about responses rather than just sort of saying it is happening”, he told journalists.
Fellow author Debra Roberts said it was important for policymakers “to realise the rules of the game are now changing”.
“I think for me that’s the clarion call … we now have to reconfigure our climate governance around dealing with an overshoot pathway. None of our plans are prepared for that,” Roberts from the University of KwaZulu-Natal said.
DISMAY
The report’s stark language alarmed climate campaigners who have rallied around 1.5°C since it was affirmed as the more ambitious goal of the Paris Agreement a decade ago.
Jasper Inventor, deputy programme director at Greenpeace International, said: “This is a heartbreaking moment, but overshoot is not the reason to give up and surrender 1.5°C.”
Bill Hare, a climate scientist and chief executive officer of policy institute Climate Analytics, slammed the report and said it risked becoming “a call to apathy rather than a call to arms”.
Small island nations threatened by rising seas have been particularly vocal defenders of the 1.5°C target and have urged wealthier countries not to abandon the milestone even as it slips out of reach.
The world has already warmed roughly 1.4°C since the 1850s to 1900s, mostly from the burning of fossil fuels, and the last three years have been the hottest on record.
NO GOOD OUTCOMES
Scientists say any overshoot of 1.5°C threatens more extreme weather and pushes the planet closer to tipping points like the collapse of ice sheets and loss of coral reefs.
UNEP executive director Inger Andersen said there “are no good outcomes if we remain above 1.5°C”.
“Let’s be very clear – that 1.5°C target is still the goal. But now, we need to approach it differently: from above,” Andersen told journalists.
Guterres said it was possible to bring warming back below 1.5°C by the end of the century.
“The fight for 1.5°C is the fight for humanity,” he said.
To achieve this, carbon dioxide removal – the process of pulling carbon from the air and storing it – would be essential alongside deep and rapid cuts to greenhouse gas emissions, the UNEP report said.
At present, carbon removal plays a vanishingly small part in addressing climate change and is strongly opposed by many activists pushing for a faster phase-out of coal, oil and gas.
Lili Fuhr from campaign organisation CIEL said: “The only way to minimise harm is to cut emissions now … not to delay action with speculative techno-fixes.”
Source: AFP/rk
Sign up for our newsletters
Get the CNA app
Stay updated with notifications for breaking news and our best stories
Get WhatsApp alerts
Join our channel for the top reads for the day on your preferred chat app
Get bite-sized news via a new
cards interface. Give it a try.
Click here to return to FAST
Tap here to return to FAST
FAST
